While recording the vocals of my cover of "Back In Black" tonight I came to a standstill. I did both the stupid AC/DC voice and a heavily articulated normal singing voice. Both of these versions make me laugh, but for two different reasons. If I use the AC/DC voice, I am making fun of that ridiculous noise which that man produces and passes off as singing. If I use a heavily articulated normal voice, I am making fun of the stupid lyrics, which sound twice as stupid in a normal voice. I am completely torn between which shitty aspect of AC/DC to make fun of. I am going to need other input to solve this dilemma. I shall post what I have of both versions on Myspace sometime in the next few days, and I would like to know which you think is funnier. Give me feedback to help me make fun of AC/DC in the most comical way possible.

Ravi struck at 21:12